Konsep Ahliyyah Dalam Hadis Iżā Wussida Al-Amru Ilā Gairi Ahlihi: Analisis Ma‘Ānī Al-Ḥadīṡ Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan

Authors

  • Fajar Dwi Prayoga Ma'had Aly Hasyim Asy'ari
  • Elyas Febrian Prayogi Ma'had Aly Hasyim Asy'ari
  • Fikri Labib ‘Afafi Ma'had Aly Hasyim Asy'ari
  • Ilham Fajar Ma'had Aly Hasyim Asy'ari
  • Ahmad 'Ubaidy Hasbillah Universitas Hasyim Asy'ari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35132/albayan.v9i2.2035

Keywords:

Ahliyyah , Ahliyyat al-Isti‘ānah, Ma‘ānī al-Ḥadīṡ, Kecerdasan Buatan, Otoritas Keagamaan

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence is no longer confined to technical tasks; it is increasingly involved in high-stakes affairs such as leadership, fatwa, and adjudication. Existing studies generally conclude that artificial intelligence lacks ahliyyah and may therefore serve only as a tool, without explaining the eligibility required of the humans who rely on it or capturing its hidden shift from tool to authority. This study aims to formulate a concept of ahliyyah from the hadith Iżā wussida al-amru ilā gairi ahlihi and to contextualize it for the use of artificial intelligence in the amr of qiyādah, iftā’, and qaḍā’. This library research employs the taḥlīlī method of hadith study with a ma‘ānī al-ḥadīṡ approach, comprising criticism of the chain and text, linguistic and rhetorical (balāgah) analysis, examination of the commentaries, and contextualization of the concept of ahliyyat al-adā’. The findings show that the hadith is authentic (ṣaḥīḥ) and that the word wussida, derived from wisādah (cushion), depicts the amr as something leaned upon, so that in the context of artificial intelligence the demand for ahliyyah falls upon the human who leans on it. The study formulates the concept of ahliyyat al-isti‘ānah, the eligibility to seek the assistance of artificial intelligence, resting on competence independence, verification capacity, and ownership of ideas and responsibility. The concept distinguishes three positions of artificial intelligence, namely as wasīlah, as a formal muwassad ilaih, and as a de facto support, and shows that the last is the most subtle form of the death of expertise warned of in the hadith.

References

Ab Razak, Mohamed Rashid bin, Muhammad Amrullah bin Drs Nasrul, dan Ibrahim Abbas. “Towards a Sharī‘ah-Compliant Framework for AI-Supported Fatwa in Malaysian Hajj Management: A Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah and Governance Perspective.” Millah: Journal of Religious Studies 25, no. 1 (2026): 39–80. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol25.iss1.art2

Abū Dāwud, Sulaimān ibn al-Asy‘aṡ al-Sijistānī. Sunan Abī Dāwud. Beirut: al-Maktabah al-‘Aṣriyyah, t.t.

Akmal, Nur Ahmadi, dkk. “Artificial Intelligence in Islamic Fatwa: A Maqasid al-Syariah and Hadith Perspective.” Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu’ashirah: Media Kajian Al-Qur’an dan Al-Hadits Multi Perspektif 23, no. 1 (2026): 222–44. https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v23i1.33789

Al-‘Ainī, Badr al-Dīn. ‘Umdat al-Qārī Syarḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, t.t.

Al-‘Uṡaimīn, Muḥammad ibn Ṣāliḥ. Syarḥ al-Manẓūmah al-Baiqūniyyah fī Muṣṭalaḥ al-Ḥadīṡ. Dār al-Ṡurayyā, 2003.

Al-Bukhārī, Muḥammad ibn Ismā‘īl. Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Damaskus: Dār Ibn Kaṡīr, 1993.

Al-Nawawī, Abū Zakariyyā Yaḥyā ibn Syaraf. Al-Minhāj Syarḥ Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāṡ al-‘Arabī, 1392 H.

Al-Sāmarrā’ī, Fāḍil Ṣāliḥ. Ma‘ānī al-Naḥw. Amman: Dār al-Fikr li al-Ṭibā‘ah wa al-Nasyr wa al-Tauzī‘, 2000.

Al-Ṣan‘ānī, Muḥammad ibn Ismā‘īl. Al-Taḥbīr li Īḍāḥ Ma‘ānī al-Taisīr. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Rusyd, 2012.

Al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn. Al-Tausyīḥ Syarḥ al-Jāmi‘ al-Ṣaḥīḥ. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Rusyd, 1998.

Amrulloh. “Metode Studi Hadis Taḥlīlī dan Implementasinya.” Nabawi: Journal of Hadith Studies 2, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.55987/njhs.v2i2.49.

Ashaari, Muhamad Faisal, Irwan Mohd Subri, Hasanah Abd Khafidz, dan Jawaher Hamad Muhammad Al-Marri. “Kerangka Fiqh bagi Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Islam: Analisis Naratif terhadap Persidangan ke-26 Majma‘ al-Fiqh al-Islāmī al-Duwalī.” Journal of Fatwa Management and Research 31, no. 2 (2026): 391–419. https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol31no2.805

Bafadhal, M. Iqbal. “Toward a Hybrid Maqāṣid-Based Artificial Intelligence Fatwās Governance Model: Rethinking Ijtihad Authority, Accountability, and Legitimacy.” Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman 21, no. 1 (2026): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.21274/epis.2026.21.01.1-21

Gerlich, Michael. “AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking.” Societies 15, no. 1 (2025): 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006

Ibn Abī Ḥātim, ‘Abd al-Raḥmān. Al-Jarḥ wa al-Ta‘dīl. Hyderabad: Maṭba‘at Majlis Dā’irat al-Ma‘ārif al-‘Uṡmāniyyah, 1952.

Ibn Ḥajar al-‘Asqalānī, Aḥmad ibn ‘Alī. Fatḥ al-Bārī Syarḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah, 1379 H.

Ibn Ḥajar al-‘Asqalānī, Aḥmad ibn ‘Alī. Tahżīb al-Tahżīb. Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Risālah, 2014.

Naurah, Ezra Syahla, dan Brezto Asagi Dewantara. “Efektivitas ChatGPT sebagai Alat Bantu dalam Menyelesaikan Tugas Akademik Mahasiswa Teknologi Pendidikan Universitas Lambung Mangkurat.” J-INSTECH: Journal of Instructional Technology 6, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/10.20527/j-instech.v6i2.15633

Nichols, Tom. The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.

Nugraha, Wandi. “Perilaku Mahasiswa dalam Memanfaatkan Generative AI: Tinjauan Etika Akademik.” Manifestasi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran 6, no. 2 (2026).

Parasuraman, Raja, dan Dietrich H. Manzey. “Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration.” Human Factors 52, no. 3 (2010): 381–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810376055

Quinlan, Kathleen M., dkk. “Educationally Authentic Assessment: Reframing Authentic Assessment in Relation to Students’ Meaningful Engagement.” Teaching in Higher Education 30, no. 3 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2024.2394042

Ramadhan, Bilal, dan Najwa Nabila Az Zahra. “Kontekstualisasi Hadis-Hadis Amanah dan Relevansinya terhadap Pencegahan Korupsi di Indonesia: Studi Ma‘anil Hadis.” Jawahir Al-Ahadis 2, no. 1 (2026). https://doi.org/10.30983/jawahir.v2i1.10461

Risko, Evan F., dan Sam J. Gilbert. “Cognitive Offloading.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20, no. 9 (2016): 676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002

Rosyid, Muhammad, dan Muhammad Anwar Idris. “Makna Ahl dalam Al-Qur’an Perspektif Semantik ‘Aisyah Bintu Syathi’.” Academic Journal of Islamic Principles and Philosophy 1, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.22515/ajipp.v1i2.2688

Sagirah, Sitti. “The Adverse Effects of Recruiting Non-Expert Officials (A Study of the Predictive Hadith: Entrusting Affairs to Non-Experts).” Farabi 20, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.30603/jf.v20i2.4314

Syauqi, Muhammad Labib, dan Ahmad Yusuf Prasetiawan. “Fiqih bagi Penyandang Disabilitas Mental: Telaah Hukum Islam terhadap Konsep Ahliyyah dan Maslahah.” Inklusi: Journal of Disability Studies 11, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.14421/ijds.110105

Yunos, Ahmad Safwan, dkk. “The Concept of Al-’Ahliyyah and Takyif Fiqhiyy for Autonomous Mobile Robots According to Syariah.” Al-Qanatir: International Journal of Islamic Studies 33, no. 7 (2024): 14–32.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-13

How to Cite

Fajar Dwi Prayoga, Elyas Febrian Prayogi, Fikri Labib ‘Afafi, Ilham Fajar, & Ahmad ’Ubaidy Hasbillah. (2026). Konsep Ahliyyah Dalam Hadis Iżā Wussida Al-Amru Ilā Gairi Ahlihi: Analisis Ma‘Ānī Al-Ḥadīṡ Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan. Al-Bayan: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadist, 9(2), 384–404. https://doi.org/10.35132/albayan.v9i2.2035

Issue

Section

Articles